We have been listening to and experiencing some pretty amazing things about business and economic life in Latin America but our visit yesterday to two Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) the Kallari Cooperative http://www.kallari.com/, and the Maquipucuna Foundation http://maqui.myweb.uga.edu/ were perhaps the most emotionally moving of all of our visits. In both cases very committed people were bringing business skills to create sustainable opportunities for fragile populations and environments.
Ecuador has more than 40,000 NGOs operating within its borders, 400 concerned with issues related to environmental degradation and preservation. There are also a number of NGOs providing social and cultural support for the many indigenous and often poor rural populations of Ecuador.
One of the first Ecuadorean NGOs was started by UC Davis alumna Rebeca Justicia. According to her, “UC Davis has almost everything to do with what we do in Ecuador.” That is high praise considering that Justicia’s Fundacion Maquipucuna is a 15,000-acre, privately owned tropical reserve that protects some of the most biologically diverse land on earth. The Foundation supports scientific study, eco-tourism and provides jobs for many of the area’s rural population.
We met at Macquipucuna’s Quito office where Justicia and her staff, including her co-founder and husband Rodrigo, manage the grant-writing and outreach that sustain the cloud forest preserve about 50 miles away. Rebeca’s story, told over an hour with cups of Macquipucuna coffee, was one of naivete and pluck as well as hard work and persistence.
Rebeca was a student in the 1980s at the University Catholica in Ecuador when Rodrigo, then working as a banker, learned about a spectacular piece of land that had been defaulted on by a timber company. The two of them were concerned about the rapid deforestation of the Ecuadorean highlands and saw this as an opportunity to preserve a special piece of it. Although the bank only wanted $25,000 for the 6,000 acres they had no way to finance it. The bank refused to give it to a non-profit. There are no tax-deductions for donations in Ecuador making philanthropy difficult.
Rebeca went on to UC Davis to study for a BSc in genetics, which she completed in 1988, but she and Rodrigo continued to think about the special piece of Ecuadorian cloud forest that they wanted to preserve. By happenstance a major biological conference was held at UC Davis while Rebeca was doing her doctoral research and she was able to meet several environmental leaders at the conference, including Tom Lovejoy an eminent researcher with the Smithsonian Institution and expert on biodiversity in Brazil.
Rebeca’s story then takes on a madcap character--raising $3,000 at a fundraiser at the Blue Mango Cafe in Davis that allowed her and Rodrigo to fly to Washington to plea their case at the World Wildlife Fund and other major environmental foundations. The rental car company, all out of standard vehicles, rented them a Mercedes-Benz and they were taken seriously by the Washington NGOs.
One month later the The Nature Conservancy called to say they had a possible donor, but he wanted to see the land. Rebeca and Rodrigo, who had recently founded their NGO, begged a storage room in the Quito National Museum, remodeled it as an “office” and tried to look more established and mature when the potential donor visited.
The story goes on from there into many twists and turns, but they received the donation and leveraged it with a “debt-for-land swap,” an idea they learned about from Tom Lovejoy at the UC Davis conference. It is a strategy whereby debtor nations can swap property and cancel loans to international agencies. The exchange rates allowed the donor to greatly increase the impact of his gift.
Today their NGO is a success story that requires constant attention and maintenance. Maquipucuna Reserve hosts students, volunteers and researchers and provides 120 jobs, education and health care to the nearby population while protecting a spectacular and important region. They are constantly looking for economic support.
What is the business lesson we learned here?
Early in their venture Rebeca and Rodrigo followed the traditional Ecuadorian practice of paternalism--giving things away as the grant money came in. “But now we only give jobs or loans” because that creates a sustainable economy. In order to provide ongoing benefits to the environment and the Maquipucuna region, they have started eco-tourism, coffee plantations and a bamboo business. They practice “active capitalism.”
“We do for-profit, and for-purpose.”
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Ecuador Enchantment
When we were in Panama people told us to expect a far less-developed country. We were even told that we should have gone to Ecuador first to see a backward country and then we would appreciate how far Panama has developed. In fact, we have all been charmed by Ecuador and find the country an attractive developing nation. It does not have nearly the U.S. influence of Panama, and nothing like the Canal, but the streets are pretty clean, the transportation seems to run quite well, and the locals are invariably helpful and welcoming. It is clear why tourism is a developing industry here in the Andean highlands around Quito.
We arrived at the Quito airport on Friday night and split into three groups. One group jumped into a van and headed south for Banos, a charming provincial city with hot springs, water falls and zip lines through the jungle. Another group went off to the Killan cacao bean cooperative. Twelve hundred families belong to a coop that processes their beans into high-end cocoa for export to Switzerland and other premium chocolate manufacturers. That group got to help process fermenting beans and help in the production. They left promising to help the cooperative's financial management practices.
Wil Agatstein and I opted to stay in Quito. We both had some work to do and thought a weekend away from the class was probably a good idea all around. We took off on Saturday and jumped on the "trole" or trolley into the older colonial part of town and walked back stopping at the National Art Museum for a Chagall exhibit, enjoying the numerous public squares, visiting food markets and just generally enjoying Quito. We found a very walkable city.
Today we all resumed out study of Ecuador and the political-business climate with a visit to the U.S. Embassy. The Embassy is new and impressive, a true fortification that houses more than 300 employees. We went through a serious security check and were met by a diplomatic officer whose role is to do outreach into the community. I think we were all amazed to have a series of briefings by top officials who took our visit seriously.
We had our pictures taken and were told that we would see them on the Embassy web site next month. The officials explained that Ecuador is a country squeezed between two large drug-exporting countries, Peru and Columbia, and that its position has made it wary of its neighbors. It has regular skirmishes over borders and refugees, but nothing that compares to the Middle East. One of the big issues now is a dispute with Chevron over degradation of an Amazon region caused by oil drilling. Wil and I had heard about this controversy and a law suite against Chevron from Amazon Watch activists who were staying in our hotel. We were amazed at the very different "facts" we heard from both parties. Indeed the damage was caused by Texaco beginning in the 1970s and the liability has been assumed by Chevron a few years ago after an acquisition of drilling rights. It has started the mitigation and remediation process but apparently the damage is extensive to both the natural and the human environment. There are billions of dollars at stake.
We probably learned as much about life as a diplomat as anything from our visit. The diplomatic corps members we met were constantly rotating between embassies and consulates, from one region to another. One diplomat had been assigned to Mexico, then Jordan, then Ecuador picking up Arabic on a stint in Washington. These rotations keep them from developing deep roots in any one society, and keeps them focused on their ties to the U.S. and its mission. Four of our students talked about taking the Foreign Service Entrance Examination. I could see the wanderlust in their eyes.
Our last visit was to a factory that makes shirts and caps with embroidered logos for businesses such as the local Pepsi distributor and for tourist venues like the Galapagos Islands. Wil and I were expecting perhaps a sweat shop--this is a low-wage country--but the factory was clean and well lit and had little turnover. Again, we were pleasantly surprised by Ecuador.
We arrived at the Quito airport on Friday night and split into three groups. One group jumped into a van and headed south for Banos, a charming provincial city with hot springs, water falls and zip lines through the jungle. Another group went off to the Killan cacao bean cooperative. Twelve hundred families belong to a coop that processes their beans into high-end cocoa for export to Switzerland and other premium chocolate manufacturers. That group got to help process fermenting beans and help in the production. They left promising to help the cooperative's financial management practices.
Wil Agatstein and I opted to stay in Quito. We both had some work to do and thought a weekend away from the class was probably a good idea all around. We took off on Saturday and jumped on the "trole" or trolley into the older colonial part of town and walked back stopping at the National Art Museum for a Chagall exhibit, enjoying the numerous public squares, visiting food markets and just generally enjoying Quito. We found a very walkable city.
Today we all resumed out study of Ecuador and the political-business climate with a visit to the U.S. Embassy. The Embassy is new and impressive, a true fortification that houses more than 300 employees. We went through a serious security check and were met by a diplomatic officer whose role is to do outreach into the community. I think we were all amazed to have a series of briefings by top officials who took our visit seriously.
We had our pictures taken and were told that we would see them on the Embassy web site next month. The officials explained that Ecuador is a country squeezed between two large drug-exporting countries, Peru and Columbia, and that its position has made it wary of its neighbors. It has regular skirmishes over borders and refugees, but nothing that compares to the Middle East. One of the big issues now is a dispute with Chevron over degradation of an Amazon region caused by oil drilling. Wil and I had heard about this controversy and a law suite against Chevron from Amazon Watch activists who were staying in our hotel. We were amazed at the very different "facts" we heard from both parties. Indeed the damage was caused by Texaco beginning in the 1970s and the liability has been assumed by Chevron a few years ago after an acquisition of drilling rights. It has started the mitigation and remediation process but apparently the damage is extensive to both the natural and the human environment. There are billions of dollars at stake.
We probably learned as much about life as a diplomat as anything from our visit. The diplomatic corps members we met were constantly rotating between embassies and consulates, from one region to another. One diplomat had been assigned to Mexico, then Jordan, then Ecuador picking up Arabic on a stint in Washington. These rotations keep them from developing deep roots in any one society, and keeps them focused on their ties to the U.S. and its mission. Four of our students talked about taking the Foreign Service Entrance Examination. I could see the wanderlust in their eyes.
Our last visit was to a factory that makes shirts and caps with embroidered logos for businesses such as the local Pepsi distributor and for tourist venues like the Galapagos Islands. Wil and I were expecting perhaps a sweat shop--this is a low-wage country--but the factory was clean and well lit and had little turnover. Again, we were pleasantly surprised by Ecuador.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
We Stand at the Center of World Trade
MBA students study world trade in many ways. They study supply chain management—how to efficiently design, source, assemble and distribute goods from around the world. They examine global capital flows and currency exchange rates and learn international finance and tax strategies. Our students learn the impact of trade on labor practices, migration, energy use and economic development. In many ways the students came to Panama knowledgeable about global trade and its impact as a result of their business experience and what they are learning in class.
For two days this week they got to experience global trade in a way we cannot teach them at UC Davis. They saw trade as a material flow, as huge ships carrying goods from one distant place to another. There is nothing quite like seeing dozens of ships queued up to enter the Panama Canal, or standing in the midst of thousands of containers being off-loaded and re-loaded at the Port of Balboa to appreciate the enormity and connectedness of global exchange.
On Wednesday we went to the Panama Canal Authority, the governance and administration office of the Panama Canal, and to visit the Miraflores Locks. The Canal is not the long tube-like passage I had imagined. Rather it is a series of locks that raise ships in a step-wise fashion at one end until they reach the large man-made Gatun Lake which is 85 feet above sea level. They traverse the lake and a series of islands in the middle of the country under the control of one of the Canal’s 300 pilot captains. The ships then step down through another series of locks to the other ocean, either the Atlantic or Pacific depending on the direction of travel.
I could see why cruise ships take this trip. Not only is it a bird’s eye view of an engineering marvel, it is a trip through a lush tropical landscape. The whole trip takes 24 to 48 hours and the crossing fee can be well over $100,000. The largest tariff ever was more than $300,000.
The Panama Canal is being expanded to accommodate larger ships. “Panamax” ships – the maximum size vessel currently accommodated in the Canal, are now dwarfed by newer container ships. In order to compete successfully with the Suez Canal, the Panamanians are developing a third series of “post-Panamax” locks. This is a $5+ billion investment by the Panamanian people in the future of the Canal.
Because the Canal is not being used by the U.S. as a strategic military asset, but by Panamanians who see it as an economic and development asset, they are investing in it as a business. It is extremely well run—something we learned from engineering consultants back in California—and is now a place that Panamanians can learn management techniques. We saw a troop of maritime engineer students who were on internships at the Canal.
Through a couple of well-placed phone calls we were invited to stand, literally, on a swaying bridge atop the Miraflores Locks. I may travel through the Canal some day, but I suspect that this was the only time I will ever stand on the Panama Canal.
For two days this week they got to experience global trade in a way we cannot teach them at UC Davis. They saw trade as a material flow, as huge ships carrying goods from one distant place to another. There is nothing quite like seeing dozens of ships queued up to enter the Panama Canal, or standing in the midst of thousands of containers being off-loaded and re-loaded at the Port of Balboa to appreciate the enormity and connectedness of global exchange.
On Wednesday we went to the Panama Canal Authority, the governance and administration office of the Panama Canal, and to visit the Miraflores Locks. The Canal is not the long tube-like passage I had imagined. Rather it is a series of locks that raise ships in a step-wise fashion at one end until they reach the large man-made Gatun Lake which is 85 feet above sea level. They traverse the lake and a series of islands in the middle of the country under the control of one of the Canal’s 300 pilot captains. The ships then step down through another series of locks to the other ocean, either the Atlantic or Pacific depending on the direction of travel.
I could see why cruise ships take this trip. Not only is it a bird’s eye view of an engineering marvel, it is a trip through a lush tropical landscape. The whole trip takes 24 to 48 hours and the crossing fee can be well over $100,000. The largest tariff ever was more than $300,000.
The Panama Canal is being expanded to accommodate larger ships. “Panamax” ships – the maximum size vessel currently accommodated in the Canal, are now dwarfed by newer container ships. In order to compete successfully with the Suez Canal, the Panamanians are developing a third series of “post-Panamax” locks. This is a $5+ billion investment by the Panamanian people in the future of the Canal.
Because the Canal is not being used by the U.S. as a strategic military asset, but by Panamanians who see it as an economic and development asset, they are investing in it as a business. It is extremely well run—something we learned from engineering consultants back in California—and is now a place that Panamanians can learn management techniques. We saw a troop of maritime engineer students who were on internships at the Canal.
Through a couple of well-placed phone calls we were invited to stand, literally, on a swaying bridge atop the Miraflores Locks. I may travel through the Canal some day, but I suspect that this was the only time I will ever stand on the Panama Canal.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Lessons Learned about U.S. While in Panama
Our ostensible purpose in traveling with MBA students abroad is to give them the opportunity to understand business conditions in another part of the world and to encourage them to develop the perspectives and skills useful in doing trade in a non-U.S. setting. Most are already experienced travelers and speak several languages among them. We are fortunate in having four students fluent in Spanish on the trip although none are native speakers.
But even experienced travelers have much to gain by meeting people in their own settings and asking them about their world and how it operates.
Perhaps less obviously we learn who we are when we discover who others are. We learn about the U.S. when we are immersed in a non-U.S. country. Those things that we take for granted are put in relief when we don’t see them.
At dinner last night, at Casa de Marisco, a wonderful seafood restaurant, I asked the students who were with Wil Agatstein and I what they were learning about their own country while in Panama.
Here’s some of what we talked about.
But even experienced travelers have much to gain by meeting people in their own settings and asking them about their world and how it operates.
Perhaps less obviously we learn who we are when we discover who others are. We learn about the U.S. when we are immersed in a non-U.S. country. Those things that we take for granted are put in relief when we don’t see them.
At dinner last night, at Casa de Marisco, a wonderful seafood restaurant, I asked the students who were with Wil Agatstein and I what they were learning about their own country while in Panama.
Here’s some of what we talked about.
- They learned, as expected, that petty corruption is rampant in dealings with government officials in Panama and business people are very open in discussing it. Panamanian business elites believe government corruption is an impediment to development. The students have been surprised to be asked in return about our corruption. The U.S. is seen as an equally corrupt society by Panamanians and we have been asked about Bernie Madoff, AIG bonuses, the former Illinois governor, and the elite corruption of powerful business and political officials.
- The U.S. ran the Canal Zone as a strategic military asset for almost 100 years with little concern for the welfare of the Panamanian society. Panama has among the largest differences in wealth between the rich and poor in the world. Under Panamanian control the very professionally run Panama Canal Authority is producing billions of dollars for the local society, but more importantly is being used to teach management skills, environmental science, and engineering to the citizens. Why did the U.S. not take the opportunity to support its own interests in the Canal Zone while contributing to the local population in meaningful ways?
- The U.S. is complicated and bureaucratic in comparison to Panama. Personal connections – with and without bribes attached – is a quick way to get things done. One phone call lead to a quick chain of connections that allowed us to literally walk on the Canal locks. The official procedure would have taken weeks. A Panamanian corporate lawyer who works regularly with the global legal community said that “Americans like to complicate things, but then again they get paid by the hour.” In comparison the lawyers of other companies are more direct, less concerned with interpretation and more concerned with outcome for clients.
- Americans are too busy. We have all been astounded by the amount of time that important people have given to us, just to make sure we understand what we are seeing. They have clearly enjoyed the interaction with us, too. At dinner the table was ours for the evening. As one student said, “If this had been the U.S. the waiter would have invited us to sit at the bar and enjoy a free dessert if we would leave the table.”
- We do not use very much color. Houses and clothes are much more colorful here in comparison to the dominance of beige, grey and taupe in U.S. public life.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
From the Pacific to the Atlantic by Bus in Two Hours
Panama’s geography has been simultaneously its great fortune and the source of its violent and often tragic history. Shaped like a bending salamander, the Panamanian isthmus today connects democratic ecotourism haven Costa Rica to the north, with Columbia and its illicit drug trade to the south. Panama is a long, skinny country with a history of outsiders controlling its fortunes.
Panama is an economically viable nation because of a canal that allows the transshipment of huge container ships and easy passage for cruise liners between Asia and North America. This accident of geography—a tiny waist that separates the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea—makes Panama a valuable piece of real estate in the global economy.
Panama was already important to maritime trade before the French started building the Panama Canal in the late 19th century. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finished the job in the early 20th century after the death of 25,000 laborers and soldiers from disease and accidents.
The region was favored by European explorers and traders as a way station for trade moving between South America and Europe. Panama’s location and fine harbors made it a favorite place to exchange goods and money, and often slaves from Africa as early as the 16th century.
On our first day in Panama we loaded into a rental bus for a trip to the Caribbean—a two-hour drive to the other coast. Panama has a tropical climate, but this season it is less humid and rainy than most of the year. We stopped at a roadside stand to try fresh coconut milk and buy a couple of watermelons. We inspected the plantains and taro roots, and the homemade condiments packaged in old Heinz ketchup bottles. The local stray dog sniffed about.
We stopped at Portobelo which lives up to its name "beautiful port." It is a lovely harbor surrounded by steep green hills and is a naturally defensible place in which to drop goods traveling up the coast. Portobelo is now a World Heritage Site whose museum and buildings preserve the memory of the region as a site of piracy, plunder, and the slave trade in addition to its role in merchant shipping between the Old and New Worlds.
The remnants of that world remain in the Custom House, the fortifications, and poignantly in the Panamanians of African descent who live simply, and in some cases in obvious poverty, in exactly the same place their ancestors were bought and sold.
Panama was, and remains, a country blessed and cursed by geography.
Continue to follow our travels on the trip's Web site >>
Panama is an economically viable nation because of a canal that allows the transshipment of huge container ships and easy passage for cruise liners between Asia and North America. This accident of geography—a tiny waist that separates the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea—makes Panama a valuable piece of real estate in the global economy.
Panama was already important to maritime trade before the French started building the Panama Canal in the late 19th century. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finished the job in the early 20th century after the death of 25,000 laborers and soldiers from disease and accidents.
The region was favored by European explorers and traders as a way station for trade moving between South America and Europe. Panama’s location and fine harbors made it a favorite place to exchange goods and money, and often slaves from Africa as early as the 16th century.
On our first day in Panama we loaded into a rental bus for a trip to the Caribbean—a two-hour drive to the other coast. Panama has a tropical climate, but this season it is less humid and rainy than most of the year. We stopped at a roadside stand to try fresh coconut milk and buy a couple of watermelons. We inspected the plantains and taro roots, and the homemade condiments packaged in old Heinz ketchup bottles. The local stray dog sniffed about.
We stopped at Portobelo which lives up to its name "beautiful port." It is a lovely harbor surrounded by steep green hills and is a naturally defensible place in which to drop goods traveling up the coast. Portobelo is now a World Heritage Site whose museum and buildings preserve the memory of the region as a site of piracy, plunder, and the slave trade in addition to its role in merchant shipping between the Old and New Worlds.
The remnants of that world remain in the Custom House, the fortifications, and poignantly in the Panamanians of African descent who live simply, and in some cases in obvious poverty, in exactly the same place their ancestors were bought and sold.
Panama was, and remains, a country blessed and cursed by geography.
Continue to follow our travels on the trip's Web site >>
Monday, March 16, 2009
We're Off to Panama and Ecuador!
There was a time—and I remember it well—when we actually taught a course in international business at UC Davis. The idea was that there was business, and then there was that exotic version, international business, that dealt with trying to open markets in places that did not speak English as a first language. Mostly that meant tips on doing business in European capitals.
The rise of Japan as a major manufacturer forever changed our view of the U.S. as the only country that could export large amounts of goods, and even innovate management practices. We spent a decade studying Edward Deming, Theory M, and Toyotism as we tried to move away from domestic management practices we could trace to the era of Henry Ford in favor of lean manufacturing and continuous improvement.
More recently we accepted the idea that American goods made by U.S.-based companies such as The Gap and the Chrysler Corporation might have some foreign components, even a majority of them sometimes. We realized those really well-priced goods at Wal-Mart are often sourced from countries we have trouble placing on a map, and even that the Chinese government is ostensibly our banker.
What's the world coming to?
We are linked, for good and for ill. We design in one place, source in another, and sell everywhere it makes business sense.
At the Graduate School School of Management we began teaching an International Study Practicum, which focuses on a specific country or region and culminates with a 10-day, first-hand learning experience. I’m on this journey to Panama and Ecuador with 16 UC Davis MBA students, and Wil Agatstein, the executive director of our Center for Entrepreneurship Executive Director. We have spent 10 weeks planning the trip and making contacts with law firms, political officials, construction companies, tourism developers, agribusiness firms, and a variety of for- and not-for-profit organizations. We’re here to learn about what it is like to be a business person in this region, to understand the opportunities and challenges of these countries in the global economy.
The students, who come from all three of our MBA programs, chose this region because they wanted to learn about developing economies where the possibilities for new markets are great and where market development is not already dominated by established firms. They are motivated by curiosity, concern for the developing world, and by the chance to develop their own savvy about global business processes. By sampling different parts of these societies we hope to get a well-rounded, if initial take on business practice in Panama and Ecuador.
You can follow our travels on the Web site that one of our students, Sonny Johl, has created. We're sharing blogs, photos, comments >>
The rise of Japan as a major manufacturer forever changed our view of the U.S. as the only country that could export large amounts of goods, and even innovate management practices. We spent a decade studying Edward Deming, Theory M, and Toyotism as we tried to move away from domestic management practices we could trace to the era of Henry Ford in favor of lean manufacturing and continuous improvement.
More recently we accepted the idea that American goods made by U.S.-based companies such as The Gap and the Chrysler Corporation might have some foreign components, even a majority of them sometimes. We realized those really well-priced goods at Wal-Mart are often sourced from countries we have trouble placing on a map, and even that the Chinese government is ostensibly our banker.
What's the world coming to?
We are linked, for good and for ill. We design in one place, source in another, and sell everywhere it makes business sense.
At the Graduate School School of Management we began teaching an International Study Practicum, which focuses on a specific country or region and culminates with a 10-day, first-hand learning experience. I’m on this journey to Panama and Ecuador with 16 UC Davis MBA students, and Wil Agatstein, the executive director of our Center for Entrepreneurship Executive Director. We have spent 10 weeks planning the trip and making contacts with law firms, political officials, construction companies, tourism developers, agribusiness firms, and a variety of for- and not-for-profit organizations. We’re here to learn about what it is like to be a business person in this region, to understand the opportunities and challenges of these countries in the global economy.
The students, who come from all three of our MBA programs, chose this region because they wanted to learn about developing economies where the possibilities for new markets are great and where market development is not already dominated by established firms. They are motivated by curiosity, concern for the developing world, and by the chance to develop their own savvy about global business processes. By sampling different parts of these societies we hope to get a well-rounded, if initial take on business practice in Panama and Ecuador.
You can follow our travels on the Web site that one of our students, Sonny Johl, has created. We're sharing blogs, photos, comments >>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)